What Is the Definition of Sin According to the Bible?

New | Torah
Noel Joshua Hadley

GOOD THING the writers of Scripture finally got around to defining sin for us. When left to the boys down at Seminary, they’ll manage to cook something else up entirely. Whatever they offer on the menu almost always smells of GMO though. I said finally, and that is because Yochanan saw the writing on the wall. He wisely managed to slip a thorough definition into one of his epistles before the doctrines of men managed to wrangle and then completely ruin a perfectly straightforward narrative. It goes as follows:

Whoever commits sin transgresses also the Torah: for sin is the transgression of the Torah.

Yochanan Ri’shon (1 John) 3:4 [Cepher]

As you may have noticed, I took the highlighter and red marker out, sparing no expense. I allowed for a break in the sentence so that you can see with your own eyes how how Yochanan repeats himself. That’s what I love about Yochanan. How very Hebrew of him. One can only wonder if he’d read somebody else’s Greek letters, wink-wink, and understood full well that generations of goyim would tirelessly debate Yah’s laws, saying Torah has been done away with and all that. Ridiculous.

That’s probably why he formed two thoughts into a singular deductive argument. You see, you can attempt to convince yourself that sin is one thing or another, but that’s all-oral tradition. I call it the Christian Talmud: when men come up with their own doctrines. It’s when people talk about sin that Yochanan slams on the breaks and adds: “Sin is also a transgression of Torah.” Now that he’s nabbed everybody’s attention, he puts gears in reverse, backs down the driveway several inches, and then clarifies, “Oh, by the way, whatever you might think sin is, there is no sin but the transgression of the Torah.” Yochanan then pulls down his shades and drives off down the street—owning it.

I decided to see how the Intel-net kingdom bouncers over at Got Questions attempted to explain away Yochanan’s definition of sin and, rather surprisingly, they didn’t. How odd. That’s so out of character. Well, technically, they delved into matters of Pauline theology within a hair’s breadth, but not before first taking the polar bear plunge to let you know First Yochanan presented the standard definition. But then immediately afterwards, all they could do is go off on a rant about Lucifer and hope you wouldn’t notice. I mean, if the Torah really had been done away with, then Yochanan didn’t receive the memo. For Yochanan, the fourth commandment was still a go. That would be Sabbath. Also, eating pork and treating tzitzits like last years fashion was a naughty no-no. The Torah abides.

And then, as if to really yank my chain, Got Questions even threw in a passage from Torah.

It reads.

Remember, and forget not, how you provoked Yahuah Elohayka to wrath in the wilderness: from the day that you did depart out of the land of Mitsrayim, until ye came unto this place, ye have been rebellious against Yahuah.

Devariym (Deuteronomy) 9:7 [Cepher]

Wow. Stop playing games with my heart, guys. Got Questions knows how to quote it. If only they could stick the landing too. I checked. The bouncers over at Got Questions have a hankering for pork. And I quote: “a good pork loin served with apples and nuts makes for a very fine meal!” Oh, sigh.

I checked again. The Sabbath has been done away with. Apparently, we no longer need Sabbath because we rest in Jesus now. Oh, do you, now? Jesus is also your bread and water. Are you telling me you no longer eat bread or drink water? How does that work, exactly? Or are we just conveniently picking and choosing our metaphors based upon Rome’s calendar? The cognitive dissonance must be a headache comparable to a collision with a 4-door Sedan and a moose, and I hear that’s a gripe. Rather than bouncers, what I should have said is gate keepers. Because that’s what they are. It’s their job to pass the Easter ham around so as to keep you unclean and enjoying your abominations during the feast of unleavened bread and Passover.

Oh, I get it. Jesus was obedient to his heavenly Father so that you wouldn’t have to be. Is that how it goes? The Freemasons and the Jesuits and the rest of the gatekeepers would have you believe we’ve got so much wasted paper in our Bibles. Except of course for the 28 percent of the New Testament written by Paul. If you’ve ever bought furniture at IKEA then you’ll recall what happens when you crack open the box. It comes with an instruction manual. Apparently, I am expected to believe that Yahuah, the Most-High Elohiym of Yashar’el, gave his children the instructions for set-apart living and then, quite suddenly, decided it was fleshly and a scurse to try and an obedience which only Satan wants from us. Is that how it goes? How our Slave Masters have inverted reality.

Quick history lesson. According to Deuteronomy, what were the children of Yashar’el rebelling against in the wilderness, exactly? Really, it’s okay, you can say it. Torah. They were rebelling against Torah. Therefore, even if someone attempted to convince themselves in the wilderness that Yah’s laws were done away with, they were still by definition being rebellious. Sounds like a lot of arguments I’ve heard of. You will tell me they hadn’t entered the land yet. Yeah, well, last I checked, we haven’t either. Still wandering. Waiting to cross that River Jordan. It didn’t end so well for Korah, but that’s probably none of my business.

Read it again. I beg of you. And then whatever you do, try not to let cognitive dissonance win the day.

Whoever commits sin transgresses also the Torah: for sin is the transgression of the Torah.

Yochanan Ri’shon (1 John) 3:4 [Cepher]

Noel

IN the summer of 2019, I was seated in the wine cellar of a walled Medieval town high above the Dordogne Valley of France, not far from Sarlat-la-Canéda, making phone calls, writing reports. I have given this story in other places and it appears as though you’re about to hear it again. Rob Skiba is a name you that you might be familiar with. Though he had made a name for himself as a Nephilim researcher, more recently Rob had taken a dive into the deep end of the pool via flat earth research. The recorded interviews I conducted between he and Rick Hummer, a fellow flat earth investigator and close friend of his, was published while still occupying that very wine cellar. Read all about it. Chicago Is Not a Mirage.

Word quickly spread. Within a few short weeks, dozens of flat earth researchers began accepting my invite for a private interview, if not a series of interviews. From a 17th-century tower built by King Louis XIV, and with a stunning view of the Alps, I sat down with Robbie Davidson, founder of the Flat Earth International Conferences, conducting multiple sessions. While staying in Dumfries, Scotland, David Weiss agreed to take part in the interviews, as did Bob Knodel of Globebusters. There were others. But when I asked the interviewees to discuss the moments that shaped their lives, among the many PSYOPs, false flag attacks, and hoaxes that were discussed, only these men committed commentary to the false 9/11 narrative.

The resulting recordings ballooned into The Unexpected Cosmology, a book which became a website and was even intended as an anthology. And of course, the following discourse was originally a chapter. It was Walt Disney who stated, “Disneyland will never be completed. It will continue to grow as long as there is imagination left in the world.” Those sentiments remain applicable here as well. American Sensationalism: The 9/11 Interviews was always intended to be expanded upon with the inclusion of new researchers. So I’m sorry to say the project became stagnant during the Covid-19 psychodrama. I took a break to tackle other projects. We lost Rob Skiba. Rob offered hours of private conversation regarding his life but we never got around to the big one. 9/11. It was in the cards. Sadly, Bob Knodel died soon afterwards. Voices are being squeezed from an entire generation. Gnosis passes with them.

In the aftermath, the FE community became fractured. People began going their separate ways. Robbie Davidson, among a noted few others who were interviewed for the project, got up and left the movement altogether. It is not my intent to erase his or the contributions of others if only brief. They came, they went, their testimonies remain.

The original vision may have hit roadblocks but it is not forgotten. I expanded this paper a few years later to include testimony from author Pauly Hart, a dear friend of mine. I had wanted to continue that trend every year thereafter but you know how it goes. For the 25th anniversary of the attack I have redirected my efforts to its first large scale expansion, including Andrew Hoy and Darrin Geisinger into the mix. Perhaps others will lend their experiences to the recorder in time.

The following is their report.

Read the 9/11 Interviews

Watch the Interviews