There’s Almost Nowhere Left Inside Russia That Ukraine Can’t Reach — With a Weapon It Now Builds by the Millions

Uncategorized

Putin November 2022

Summary and Key Points: In the early days of the invasion, Ukrainian soldiers were dropping grenades through tank hatches using drones anyone could buy online. Four years later, the country builds them by the millions — and they now carry out the overwhelming majority of every successful strike against Russian forces. The transformation has rewritten the rules of the war: cheap, swarming drones now do the work once reserved for artillery, attack helicopters, and Western missiles that Ukraine could never get enough of.

How Millions Of Ukrainian Drones Have Changed the War

Tu-95

Tu-95. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

Tu-95 Bomber Russian Air Force

Tu-95 Bomber Russian Air Force. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

Tu-95 Bear Bomber

Tu-95 Bear Bomber. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

Ukraine’s Operation Spider’s Web, which was launched on June 1 last year, was arguably the biggest turning point in the war. The operation involved 117 drones targeting Russian strategic aviation assets deep inside Russian territory.

The drones were smuggled over the border and conducted hugely damaging strikes that the Russians didn’t expect. The operation damaged or destroyed multiple high-value aircraft used by Moscow to launch long-range missile attacks against Ukraine – and it proved that Ukraine was capable of fighting back without the use of expensive, Western-supplied missiles.

It also proved just how central drones have become to Kyiv’s war effort. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy recently said that more than 80 percent of successful strikes against Russian forces are now carried out using drones – and four years into the war, Ukraine is producing these unmanned aircraft on an industrial scale.

Drones have changed the war, and could change the course of history.

Ukraine Is Producing Drones On An Industrial Scale

During the early days of the conflict, a small number of commercial drones – typically Chinese-made DJI products – were used to attack tanks on the battlefield.

The drones were often used to drop munitions like grenades into open hatches. However, the drones soon became harder to obtain, and a combination of private manufacturers and volunteer initiatives sought to fill the gap – and develop new drones that were better suited to the war.

Around 1,000 Ukrainian defense manufacturers are now producing weapons and military equipment for Ukraine, many of which were founded after the war began.

The Ukrainian government has made drone production a national priority, directing significant resources toward the development and procurement of drones that make striking Russian targets easier and less expensive.

Production has expanded so much that it is now measured in millions of units annually rather than thousands, with analysts estimating that Ukraine produces between 1.2 and 1.8 million drones per year. Reports also indicate that the Ukrainian defense industry could soon reach 20 million drones annually. 

Where Ukraine’s Drones Come From

While much of Ukraine’s drone fleet is now produced domestically, the country does receive international support. Kyiv is expanding cooperation with a number of foreign partners, with Zelenskyy announcing recently that a joint German-Ukrainian production program will provide 10,000 drones to Ukrainian forces per year.

In recent days, Zelenskyy also urged the United States to come to the table and finish a drone deal. The Ukrainian president said that the U.S. wanted to “test all types of our drones” and that there was an agreement in place whereby the U.S. would test and train with Ukrainian systems.

Lancet Drone from Russia

Lancet Drone from Russia. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

“But we still don’t have a bilateral drone deal – a big framework document,” he said. 

The Drones Ukraine Uses

Ukraine doesn’t rely on a single type of drone – and it uses far more than simply fixed-wing or rotary-blade drones. Instead, Ukrainian forces field a diverse family of unmanned systems from different manufacturers, each with distinct capabilities.

During a recent presentation marking Arms Makers’ Day, Zelensky showcased 31 different drone systems. These included FPV attack drones, reconnaissance drones, bomber drones, kamikaze drones, interceptor drones, long-range strike drones, and unmanned naval systems.

Sea Baby Drone Ukraine.

Sea Baby Drone Ukraine. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

FPV, or “first-person view,” drones are among the most commonly used. They are equipped with explosive warheads and are flown directly into tanks and other targets.

Bomber drones, however, carry and release mortar rounds and grenades from above. A long-range strike drone works differently and is used against larger targets. These systems carry substantially larger warheads, are designed to damage airfields and fuel depots, and can even be used against high-value targets such as military factories and ammunition storage facilities. Some of the newest systems being fielded by Ukraine are reportedly capable of striking targets from thousands of kilometers away.

It means that today’s battlefield is dominated by drones, whereas in the early days of the war, battles were won with traditional means like tank formations and missiles. Artillery and attack helicopters are being replaced by inexpensive drone systems manufactured in their millions.

Ukraine’s Recent Strikes

Over the past week, Ukrainian drones have conducted some of their biggest strikes of the war. On May 31, Ukrainian forces struck a Saratov oil refinery on the Volga River, some 700 kilometers from the frontline.

The strikes resulted in a major fire. The same wave of attacks also hit the Lazarevo oil pumping station in Kirov Oblast. The facility is part of the pipeline network that moves Siberian crude oil toward Baltic export terminals.

Just days later, on June 3, Ukrainian long-range drones struck an oil terminal and naval facilities in St. Petersburg. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy confirmed that Ukrainian drones targeted a fuel terminal and military facilities at Kronstadt, home to elements of Russia’s Baltic Fleet and major shipbuilding infrastructure.

The strikes caused damage to multiple facilities, and people were reportedly injured. They also came only hours before the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum was due to begin.

About the Author: Jack Buckby 

Jack Buckby is a British researcher and analyst specializing in defense and national security, based in New York. His work focuses on military capability, procurement, and strategic competition, producing and editing analysis for policy and defense audiences. He brings extensive editorial experience, with a career output spanning over 1,000 articles at 19FortyFive and National Security Journal, and has previously authored books and papers on extremism and deradicalization.

IN the summer of 2019, I was seated in the wine cellar of a walled Medieval town high above the Dordogne Valley of France, not far from Sarlat-la-Canéda, making phone calls, writing reports. I have given this story in other places and it appears as though you’re about to hear it again. Rob Skiba is a name you that you might be familiar with. Though he had made a name for himself as a Nephilim researcher, more recently Rob had taken a dive into the deep end of the pool via flat earth research. The recorded interviews I conducted between he and Rick Hummer, a fellow flat earth investigator and close friend of his, was published while still occupying that very wine cellar. Read all about it. Chicago Is Not a Mirage.

Word quickly spread. Within a few short weeks, dozens of flat earth researchers began accepting my invite for a private interview, if not a series of interviews. From a 17th-century tower built by King Louis XIV, and with a stunning view of the Alps, I sat down with Robbie Davidson, founder of the Flat Earth International Conferences, conducting multiple sessions. While staying in Dumfries, Scotland, David Weiss agreed to take part in the interviews, as did Bob Knodel of Globebusters. There were others. But when I asked the interviewees to discuss the moments that shaped their lives, among the many PSYOPs, false flag attacks, and hoaxes that were discussed, only these men committed commentary to the false 9/11 narrative.

The resulting recordings ballooned into The Unexpected Cosmology, a book which became a website and was even intended as an anthology. And of course, the following discourse was originally a chapter. It was Walt Disney who stated, “Disneyland will never be completed. It will continue to grow as long as there is imagination left in the world.” Those sentiments remain applicable here as well. American Sensationalism: The 9/11 Interviews was always intended to be expanded upon with the inclusion of new researchers. So I’m sorry to say the project became stagnant during the Covid-19 psychodrama. I took a break to tackle other projects. We lost Rob Skiba. Rob offered hours of private conversation regarding his life but we never got around to the big one. 9/11. It was in the cards. Sadly, Bob Knodel died soon afterwards. Voices are being squeezed from an entire generation. Gnosis passes with them.

In the aftermath, the FE community became fractured. People began going their separate ways. Robbie Davidson, among a noted few others who were interviewed for the project, got up and left the movement altogether. It is not my intent to erase his or the contributions of others if only brief. They came, they went, their testimonies remain.

The original vision may have hit roadblocks but it is not forgotten. I expanded this paper a few years later to include testimony from author Pauly Hart, a dear friend of mine. I had wanted to continue that trend every year thereafter but you know how it goes. For the 25th anniversary of the attack I have redirected my efforts to its first large scale expansion, including Andrew Hoy and Darrin Geisinger into the mix. Perhaps others will lend their experiences to the recorder in time.

The following is their report.

Watch the Interviews