Is the Mandela Effect Restoring Michelangelo’s ‘Creation of Adam’ To It’s Original?

Mandela Effect | New | The World Stage

AMONGST all this confusion, the Sistine Chapel is finally starting to make sense. I began tackling the Mandela Effect a great many years ago now, ruminating over the implications of it all, and only recently have I felt as though I’m able to grasp some of the deeper implications at play. As another reminder, nothing is cookie cutter about the ME—nothing at all. And so, that being said, there are rumors afloat that the changes are flipping back to their original form. Some of them anyways. The Sistine Chapel seems as good a contender as any if you ask my opinion about it. Oh, ‘The Creation of Adam’ most certainly looked different at one time. No denying that. It’s all wrong now. Adam’s hand should be reaching up to the Creator and vice versa for Yahuah Elohiym. He should be reaching down. The way Michelangelo’s painting works out now is that Adam’s is slightly above God, and his fingers look, well, flimsy for lack of a better word. It’s all wrong in that Elohiym should be reaching down to man, as my memory serves me, but as I was trying to tell you, I wouldn’t be in the least bit surprised if the Mandela Effect is getting it right. Allow me to explain. You can read all about it in my ever growing Mandela Effect paper, via the PDF below.

PDF [Update]: The Mandela Effect

To download this FULL Article, including ALL of the Archived Articles here on The Unexpected Cosmology, help support the ministry by becoming a Patron at TUC!

IN the summer of 2019, I was seated in the wine cellar of a walled Medieval town high above the Dordogne Valley of France, not far from Sarlat-la-Canéda, making phone calls, writing reports. I have given this story in other places and it appears as though you’re about to hear it again. Rob Skiba is a name you that you might be familiar with. Though he had made a name for himself as a Nephilim researcher, more recently Rob had taken a dive into the deep end of the pool via flat earth research. The recorded interviews I conducted between he and Rick Hummer, a fellow flat earth investigator and close friend of his, was published while still occupying that very wine cellar. Read all about it. Chicago Is Not a Mirage.

Word quickly spread. Within a few short weeks, dozens of flat earth researchers began accepting my invite for a private interview, if not a series of interviews. From a 17th-century tower built by King Louis XIV, and with a stunning view of the Alps, I sat down with Robbie Davidson, founder of the Flat Earth International Conferences, conducting multiple sessions. While staying in Dumfries, Scotland, David Weiss agreed to take part in the interviews, as did Bob Knodel of Globebusters. There were others. But when I asked the interviewees to discuss the moments that shaped their lives, among the many PSYOPs, false flag attacks, and hoaxes that were discussed, only these men committed commentary to the false 9/11 narrative.

The resulting recordings ballooned into The Unexpected Cosmology, a book which became a website and was even intended as an anthology. And of course, the following discourse was originally a chapter. It was Walt Disney who stated, “Disneyland will never be completed. It will continue to grow as long as there is imagination left in the world.” Those sentiments remain applicable here as well. American Sensationalism: The 9/11 Interviews was always intended to be expanded upon with the inclusion of new researchers. So I’m sorry to say the project became stagnant during the Covid-19 psychodrama. I took a break to tackle other projects. We lost Rob Skiba. Rob offered hours of private conversation regarding his life but we never got around to the big one. 9/11. It was in the cards. Sadly, Bob Knodel died soon afterwards. Voices are being squeezed from an entire generation. Gnosis passes with them.

In the aftermath, the FE community became fractured. People began going their separate ways. Robbie Davidson, among a noted few others who were interviewed for the project, got up and left the movement altogether. It is not my intent to erase his or the contributions of others if only brief. They came, they went, their testimonies remain.

The original vision may have hit roadblocks but it is not forgotten. I expanded this paper a few years later to include testimony from author Pauly Hart, a dear friend of mine. I had wanted to continue that trend every year thereafter but you know how it goes. For the 25th anniversary of the attack I have redirected my efforts to its first large scale expansion, including Andrew Hoy and Darrin Geisinger into the mix. Perhaps others will lend their experiences to the recorder in time.

The following is their report.

Watch the Interviews