JUST IN: Tim Walz ERUPTS Over President Trump’s Latest Election Integrity Move!

Uncategorized

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz is in open revolt over a federal election-monitoring plan headed straight for his state.

President Trump’s Justice Department is sending monitors into key jurisdictions for the 2026 primaries, and Walz is suddenly talking as if neutral eyes inside polling places are a threat to democracy.

There is one enormous problem with that performance: Minnesota welcomed Justice Department election monitors under administrations of both parties for years.

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon laid out the new deployment herself. The Civil Rights Division has identified jurisdictions across six states, and she says this is only the beginning.

The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division explains that its attorneys and staff monitor polling places to assess compliance with federal voting-rights laws. In jurisdictions where federal observers are authorized, those observers document what they witness and report it back to the department.

Federal election monitoring long predates President Trump. Democrat administrations also sent personnel into jurisdictions across the country as part of voting-rights enforcement.

The department says its teams watch for compliance issues involving access to the ballot, discrimination, language assistance and accommodations for voters with disabilities. Division staff may also stay in contact with state and local election officials while they are in the field.

In plain English, these monitors observe and document. They do not replace Minnesota election officials, run polling places or count the state’s ballots, which makes Walz’s rhetoric sound considerably more dramatic than the actual federal role.

Walz nevertheless compared the Justice Department to a fox guarding a henhouse and accused the administration of political interference.

The Minnesota Star Tribune reported that monitors are expected in Minnesota for the August 11 primary, with an even larger federal monitoring effort planned for the November general election. The deployment is part of a six-state operation covering 15 jurisdictions.

Dhillon said the goals include increasing voter confidence and watching for barriers involving language access and voters with disabilities. Those are ordinary Civil Rights Division concerns, not evidence that Washington intends to seize control of Minnesota’s election machinery.

The paper also reported that Minnesota’s own secretary of state’s office acknowledged federal monitors have been sent into the state before. That history matters because Walz is presenting the current plan as a shocking departure from normal practice.

It is fair for any governor to demand that federal officials stay within the law. But it is also fair for Americans to ask why a monitoring system tolerated in 2004, 2020, 2022 and 2024 has suddenly become intolerable when the Trump administration is the one using it.

Dhillon answered Walz with receipts.

According to the Civil Rights chief, Minnesota welcomed 47 Justice Department monitors across six districts during those four election cycles. Then she put the obvious question directly to the governor: what changed, and what is there to hide?

The monitor fight is unfolding alongside a broader election-integrity push. CBS News reported that Dhillon sent letters to election officials across the country reminding them that federal law bars noncitizens from voting in federal elections.

The letters warned that officials could face criminal exposure if they knowingly keep ineligible noncitizens on state voter lists or help them obtain and cast ballots. A Justice Department spokesperson described the request as an effort to secure voluntary, timely compliance with existing federal obligations.

Several Democrat election officials pushed back and insisted their systems already prevent ineligible voting. The administration, meanwhile, has continued pressing states for voter-roll information and stronger proof that only eligible citizens remain registered.

That context explains the political temperature. A handful of attorneys inside polling locations is only the visible piece of a much larger fight over whether state officials will accept aggressive federal scrutiny before control of Congress is decided.

Walz can call the monitors foxes. He can accuse President Trump of plotting to rig an election by watching it more closely.

But the numbers in Dhillon’s response are brutal: 47 monitors, six Minnesota districts and four previous election cycles.

If federal observation was legitimate then, Minnesota voters deserve a much better explanation for why it is supposedly dangerous now.

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

The post JUST IN: Tim Walz ERUPTS Over President Trump’s Latest Election Integrity Move! appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

IN the summer of 2019, I was seated in the wine cellar of a walled Medieval town high above the Dordogne Valley of France, not far from Sarlat-la-Canéda, making phone calls, writing reports. I have given this story in other places and it appears as though you’re about to hear it again. Rob Skiba is a name you that you might be familiar with. Though he had made a name for himself as a Nephilim researcher, more recently Rob had taken a dive into the deep end of the pool via flat earth research. The recorded interviews I conducted between he and Rick Hummer, a fellow flat earth investigator and close friend of his, was published while still occupying that very wine cellar. Read all about it. Chicago Is Not a Mirage.

Word quickly spread. Within a few short weeks, dozens of flat earth researchers began accepting my invite for a private interview, if not a series of interviews. From a 17th-century tower built by King Louis XIV, and with a stunning view of the Alps, I sat down with Robbie Davidson, founder of the Flat Earth International Conferences, conducting multiple sessions. While staying in Dumfries, Scotland, David Weiss agreed to take part in the interviews, as did Bob Knodel of Globebusters. There were others. But when I asked the interviewees to discuss the moments that shaped their lives, among the many PSYOPs, false flag attacks, and hoaxes that were discussed, only these men committed commentary to the false 9/11 narrative.

The resulting recordings ballooned into The Unexpected Cosmology, a book which became a website and was even intended as an anthology. And of course, the following discourse was originally a chapter. It was Walt Disney who stated, “Disneyland will never be completed. It will continue to grow as long as there is imagination left in the world.” Those sentiments remain applicable here as well. American Sensationalism: The 9/11 Interviews was always intended to be expanded upon with the inclusion of new researchers. So I’m sorry to say the project became stagnant during the Covid-19 psychodrama. I took a break to tackle other projects. We lost Rob Skiba. Rob offered hours of private conversation regarding his life but we never got around to the big one. 9/11. It was in the cards. Sadly, Bob Knodel died soon afterwards. Voices are being squeezed from an entire generation. Gnosis passes with them.

In the aftermath, the FE community became fractured. People began going their separate ways. Robbie Davidson, among a noted few others who were interviewed for the project, got up and left the movement altogether. It is not my intent to erase his or the contributions of others if only brief. They came, they went, their testimonies remain.

The original vision may have hit roadblocks but it is not forgotten. I expanded this paper a few years later to include testimony from author Pauly Hart, a dear friend of mine. I had wanted to continue that trend every year thereafter but you know how it goes. For the 25th anniversary of the attack I have redirected my efforts to its first large scale expansion, including Andrew Hoy and Darrin Geisinger into the mix. Perhaps others will lend their experiences to the recorder in time.

The following is their report.

Watch the Interviews