North Korea Just Got Handed a 30-Fold Upgrade: Russian Engineers Have Reportedly Kim Jong-Un’s Ballistic Missiles

Uncategorized

Putin back in 2019 at BRICS Summit

On Saturday, 8 August, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy announced that updated intelligence reports on Russia’s preparations for its next offensive indicate that as many as 50,000 soldiers from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) could now be deployed in theatre.

“A decision has been made for 30,000 to 50,000 North Koreans to be deployed on the territory of ​Russia”, he said.

North Korean ICBM

North Korean ICBM. Image Credit: KCNA/North Korean State Media.

This is a ‌higher figure than the initial estimate in July that 30,000 Korean People’s Army (KPA) soldiers would be dispatched to the front lines in Ukraine.

The Ukrainian President made the announcement on his X page, but did not elaborate on the sources for this intelligence data.

In the past, however, the Ukrainian secret services have been, as they say, “punching well above their weight” in their efficiency and adaptability.

A recent assessment in Forbes, one of the outlets that has been covering the war in Ukraine in granular detail, describes them as “one of Kyiv’s most effective weapons.”

One of the former CIA operations officers who worked with Kyiv’s services from the early days of the war described the Ukrainians in the Forbes piece as having “approached the challenge [of the Russian invasion] with the same sense of determination many Americans felt after 9/11. There was an understanding that the stakes were existential and the only option was to keep moving forward.”

Kremlin Speech by Putin

Kremlin Speech by Putin. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

Zelenskiy also expressed his pronounced concerns about the increasing military cooperation between the DPRK and Russia.

He warned that Pyongyang’s troops, which have little to no combat experience, are now gaining significant knowledge of battlefield operations.

Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un signed a comprehensive strategic partnership treaty during Putin’s June 2024 ​visit to the capital Pyongyang. That pact includes a mutual assistance provision that, should either country face external aggression, obligates the DPRK to assist a treaty partner, which the DPRK cites as justification for its deployment.

Increasing Missile Performance and Transfer of Technology

But the greater concern, from his perspective, is the invaluable insights the DPRK is gaining from its exposure to, and Moscow’s active transfer of, advanced defense industrial technology to Pyongyang.

Last month it was revealed that Russian engineers and missile design specialists have been able to improve the accuracy of the DPRK’s KN-23 and KN-24 short-range ballistic missiles (SRBM) on an order of up to as much as 3000 percent.

Zelenskiy was explicit about the degree to which these missile improvements present a dramatically increased danger from missile attack to Ukraine, as well as to other nations.

“All of this poses a threat to every country in Asia that ⁠lies ​within range of North Korean ​missiles,” he said. The Russians’ design improvements to the DPRK weapons were developed in such a manner that this cooperation between Moscow and Pyongyang has led the Ukrainians and others to describe the Ukraine theatre of war as “a ballistic missile lab” that will cause problems for many years to come.

Zelenskiy revealed that his country’s own design analysis specialists had discovered the design changes that Russia had made to the North Korean missiles when some of the DPRK’s Russian-improved models had been discovered – presumably either partially or completely unexploded after they had been fired and then soft-landed on Ukrainian territory – but he did not disclose the ‌locations they were retrieved from.

“It is absolutely clear that North Korea will continue to build its experience ⁠in modern warfare, receive licenses from Russia, and receive all kinds of military tools from them,” he said.

Potential Exchange of Intelligence Data

Zelenskiy used the opportunity to call on Seoul to engage in closer cooperation with Kyiv. He appeared to propose that Kyiv offer its insights into the improvements that the DPRK is making to its weaponry with Russian assistance.

This would be in exchange for the Republic of Korea (ROK) supporting Ukraine’s need for more air and missile defense capabilities – a discipline in which Seoul’s defense industry is well-versed.

Zelensky said that Ukraine “would ​very much like to receive support from South Korea in an area ‌where we have a shortage”, referring to Ukraine’s deepening crisis in a shortage of air defense system missiles.

“We are ready to work on the Drone Deal and other areas as well,” he said, and he added that Ukrainian diplomats “are in contact” with Seoul ‌to push potential deals.

This month, a representative from the HUR, Ukraine’s military intelligence service, told the Reuters news service that the DPRK missile unit has begun deploying to western Russia and will be equipped with ​120 ballistic missiles and six launchers for strikes against Ukrainian units.

About the Author: Reuben F. Johnson

Reuben F. Johnson has thirty-six years of experience analyzing and reporting on foreign weapons systems, defense technologies, and international arms export policy. Johnson is the Director of Research at the Casimir Pulaski Foundation. He is also a survivor of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. He worked for years in the American defense industry as a foreign technology analyst and later as a consultant for the U.S. Department of Defense, the Departments of the Navy and Air Force, and the governments of the United Kingdom and Australia. In 2022-2023, he won two awards in a row for his defense reporting. He holds a bachelor’s degree from DePauw University and a master’s degree from Miami University in Ohio, specializing in Soviet and Russian studies. He lives in Warsaw.

IN the summer of 2019, I was seated in the wine cellar of a walled Medieval town high above the Dordogne Valley of France, not far from Sarlat-la-Canéda, making phone calls, writing reports. I have given this story in other places and it appears as though you’re about to hear it again. Rob Skiba is a name you that you might be familiar with. Though he had made a name for himself as a Nephilim researcher, more recently Rob had taken a dive into the deep end of the pool via flat earth research. The recorded interviews I conducted between he and Rick Hummer, a fellow flat earth investigator and close friend of his, was published while still occupying that very wine cellar. Read all about it. Chicago Is Not a Mirage.

Word quickly spread. Within a few short weeks, dozens of flat earth researchers began accepting my invite for a private interview, if not a series of interviews. From a 17th-century tower built by King Louis XIV, and with a stunning view of the Alps, I sat down with Robbie Davidson, founder of the Flat Earth International Conferences, conducting multiple sessions. While staying in Dumfries, Scotland, David Weiss agreed to take part in the interviews, as did Bob Knodel of Globebusters. There were others. But when I asked the interviewees to discuss the moments that shaped their lives, among the many PSYOPs, false flag attacks, and hoaxes that were discussed, only these men committed commentary to the false 9/11 narrative.

The resulting recordings ballooned into The Unexpected Cosmology, a book which became a website and was even intended as an anthology. And of course, the following discourse was originally a chapter. It was Walt Disney who stated, “Disneyland will never be completed. It will continue to grow as long as there is imagination left in the world.” Those sentiments remain applicable here as well. American Sensationalism: The 9/11 Interviews was always intended to be expanded upon with the inclusion of new researchers. So I’m sorry to say the project became stagnant during the Covid-19 psychodrama. I took a break to tackle other projects. We lost Rob Skiba. Rob offered hours of private conversation regarding his life but we never got around to the big one. 9/11. It was in the cards. Sadly, Bob Knodel died soon afterwards. Voices are being squeezed from an entire generation. Gnosis passes with them.

In the aftermath, the FE community became fractured. People began going their separate ways. Robbie Davidson, among a noted few others who were interviewed for the project, got up and left the movement altogether. It is not my intent to erase his or the contributions of others if only brief. They came, they went, their testimonies remain.

The original vision may have hit roadblocks but it is not forgotten. I expanded this paper a few years later to include testimony from author Pauly Hart, a dear friend of mine. I had wanted to continue that trend every year thereafter but you know how it goes. For the 25th anniversary of the attack I have redirected my efforts to its first large scale expansion, including Andrew Hoy and Darrin Geisinger into the mix. Perhaps others will lend their experiences to the recorder in time.

The following is their report.

Watch the Interviews