SIR ISAAC NEWTON IS A GOD—A LUMINARY of natural reason and Enlightenment thinking. During his lifetime he was a master of the mint, mathematics professor at Cambridge University, President of the Royal Society, and a knight of the realm. He barely even had time to breathe his dying last before Westminster Abbey made a monument of him. And yet he was a heretic of the worst kind. The positions which he lavished himself with were wholly conditional upon public manifestations of a certain religious devotion, and so he hid his true self under a bushel while letting the hypocrisy shine as a beacon of light. Essentially, he was a Nicodemite. John Calvin coined the term, and Newton wore the clothes well. He masterfully fooled the church into thinking he was devoted to the cause of Christ while secretly he gazed into the dark abyss of his own humanist mind.

In a 1991 issue of Christianity Today, “The Faith Behind the Famous: Isaac Newton,” Charles E. Hummel dedicated a lovey-dovey propaganda-piece to Isaac Newton, which dripped with all the springtime sap and the patriotic fluff and gloop of a tender-hearted eulogy, which a proponent of gravity or Scientism delusionist, as well as Newton’s own descendants—who labored to hide the inconvenient nature of Newton’s Nicodemite heresy—could be proud of. Hummel writes, “A member of the Anglican church, Newton attended services and participated in special projects, such as praying for the distribution of Bibles among the poor.” In the same article, he douses an extra coating of sugar-coated frosting with: “Newton’s understanding of God came primarily from the Bible, which he studied for days and weeks at a time.”

Strange indeed that Christianity Today thought it unimportant to divulge the fruit of Newton’s laborious studies—mainly, what his “understanding of God” entailed. Privately, Newton denied the trinity. Jesus Yeshua was not divine.

I don’t know if there’s an expert alive who has read the entirety of Isaac Newton’s work. With an estimated 10 million written words having survived the centuries, half of which is of the religious nature and another 1 million devoted to alchemical material, it is a behemoth collection. Even Sarah Dry, author of “The Newton Papers: The Strange and True Odyssey of Isaac Newton’s Manuscripts,” laughs at the very notion. Though, concerning its contents, she warns, “And one of the messages of the book is that getting too involved in the papers can be hazardous to your health. One of the first editors of (Newton’s) papers said an older man should take up the task, because he’d have less to lose than a younger man.”

In short, Isaac Newton was a disciple of “Jewish philosophy, the mysticism of Kabbalah and the Talmud”–This, according to Aron Heller at the Times of Israel. What most Christians do not know—or rather, the cat which has remained for the most part in the bag—is that Isaac Newton was a mystic and occultist. On these humanist learnings he developed the natural philosophy which even now dominate most people’s worldview–mainly, gravity.

S. Pancoast, author of Kabbala: Or True Science of Light (1883), celebrates Newton’s discovery of gravity when he writes: “Indeed, so much of the Newtonian Philosophy do we find in the ancient, that we cannot doubt he had been exploring the old mines of Kabbalistic lore, and had arrived at his great discoveries by following up clues gained therefrom.” Again he writes: “He (Pythagoras) was never permitted to declare publicly what he knew and believed, but taught his immediate pupils all the wonders of his philosophy, under the most binding obligation of secrecy. Pythagoras was forbidden to divulge this knowledge because it would reveal the law of attraction and repulsion, which constituted one of the great secrets of the sanctuary. Over a millennium later, Newton was led to the discovery of these forces by his studies of the Kabbalah.”

It is of no coincide then that Abraham Yahuda, a Zionist Jew and contemporary of Albert Einstein, scoured the world collecting Newton’s religious writings. According to Sarah Dry, Yahuda “set about trying to purchase the Newton papers and wrote to (his wife) Ethel on July 28, ‘I am thrilled with the thought of acquiring them. He wrote a lot about the Bible and the Jews, about Cabbala and all sorts of Jewish questions.”

Einstein took an immediate interest in his work. Sarah Dry, revealing that Einstein had hoped that Newton’s papers would never get published, also says of their inspiration: “Einstein considered Newton’s private papers with an eye toward gleaning as much as possible of his method of discovery, what he refers to here in “the formative development” of his work in physics. Einstein implicitly links the process by which Newton developed his physics and his theology; by studying the one, we might gain insight into the other.”

Gravity cannot be proven. What’s worse, it cannot even be tested except by the measure of a man’s faith. Neil DeGrasse Tyson might phrase it like this, “the Universe doesn’t have to make sense to you.” Just believe. Despite what Carl Sagan and his contemporaries might demand of adherers to the scientific method, the entire heliocentric religion can only be explained with pseudo-science, just not the “old-time religion.” Make no mistake about it; the theory of gravity is Kabbalah through-and-through. According to Migene Gonzalex-Wippler, author of The Kabbalah & Magic of Angels, gravity “is equated with Tiphareth, the sixth sphere of the Tree of Life.”

Author Edward Hendrie sums it up like this: “Gravity is not only an attribute of the Jewish god, Ein Sof, it is actually one of the god’s of the Kabbalah, in its own right.”

I confess Kabbalah is an occultist religion I’ve taken a considerable interest in as of late. I guess I just want to know why our so-called understanding of modern astronomy and the most basic ideas in string theory today, as well as astrophysics, not forgetting Newton’s gravity, all seem to concur with Babylonian mysticism in so-much as they’re mirrored astonishingly with the Zohar and Kabbalistic texts of old. They’re certainly advertised as such. Specifically, in my pursuit of understanding Jewish mysticism and its necessary visage behind today’s establishment of Copernican and Darwinian Scientism, a deception which the Lord has gladly delivered me out of, I want to know why modern Christians, who are so hasty in dismissing God’s revelation of creation in the Bible, mocking the very notion that its intended as literal, are so eager to back up the Zohar’s literal account of it.

If—according to the big bang theory—matter, space, and time all instantaneously collaborated in their formation, or “10” is the number for space-time in string theory, with “26” standing out as a requirement for mathematics in bosonic string theory, with both numbers agreeably forming the building blocks of the universe through “magic dimensions,” as modern theorists claim, in Kabbalah and modern science, how it is that medieval Jewish writers so splendidly divided truth from fantasy without knowing today’s mathematics or physics then, well, I guess I’m stumped—if modern scientists are truly “rediscovering” it, that is. And that’s the thing. How one perceives this, a fantastical retelling in the department of wishful thinking or coincidental and completely innocent discovery in the pursuit of truth; well, one’s personal conclusion changes everything.

My fellow brothers and sisters who have followed the Spirit’s prompting and returned to the Bible’s revelation of an enclosed cosmology will no doubt agree with me when I say the doctrine of Flat Earth forces all of us to take not just one step back. No-no, far more—we take any number of steps back to gain a fuller look at the panorama, perhaps in yet another hopeful attempt to seek out the promised curve of the Earth, and we’re astonished at what we see—astonished at how great this terrible delusion really, truly is, and how deep and far reaching in the pages of history it’s rooted. The deceit just keeps growing and growing with the continual expansion of our peripheral vision, the further back we stand. There’s simply no end to it.

I’m especially intrigued by Kabbalah’s teaching regarding “God’s retreat,” or emptying Himself from the cosmos by retracting infinite light, so as to make room for big-bang creation, and how the new spirituality of Scientism can match this to portray everything before us as a potential vessel for the enlightenment of divinity. After a while, Darwinian Evolution and the Babylonian religion and the Copernican globe, each apparently backed with these Kabbalah texts, all bleed into the same agenda—the Luciferian lie.

I realize now that talking about Kabbalah and Babylonian mysticism wasn’t my actual intent when sitting down to write this, nor was it the secret papers of Newton. So far as my reevaluation into astronomy and astrophysics has gone, now that I’ve decided to take my stand with a Holy Bible which outright opposes such beliefs, all of this, particularly my previous indoctrination into the very system by which I claimed to oppose, has produced more of a culture shock, if anything. If I never realized the extent to which Creationists fooled me into believing their pursuit of Science was a Biblical one, it’s simply because never in all my life could I nor did I wish to believe that my own church leaders would pull the wool over my eyes in either stance, be it a purposefully deceitful or subconscious decision on their part.  I certainly didn’t set out on this Flat Earth quest considering either two as an option, not even in the back of my inner-skull, and yet here we are.

Now we peel back the curtain of a great hypocrisy. I was instructed to align myself with creationists who willingly apply cosmic evolution into their teachings of Biblical astronomy, among other disciplines. I’d hear them talking about stars and planets being formed by the coalescing of cosmic gases or starlight traveling from quadrillions of miles away and somehow incorporating that belief-system into Genesis while simultaneously adding a young-earth time stamp for our approval, and convince myself that the very “Science” by which they were rationalizing was somehow a Biblical one. Quite frankly, it’s not.

This all goes back to my original question. I guess I just want to know why modern Christians, who are so hasty in dismissing God’s revelation of creation in the Bible, mocking the very notion that it’s intended as literal, are so eager to back up the Zohar’s literal account of it. Are we so arrogant as to claim we know more or better than God’s own testimony of Himself through creation, described by Moses, the prophets, scribes, poets, and Apostles, as to oppose it, or is it at all possible that, by skewing off the straight and narrow path in our solitary pursuit of quantifying what was once-hidden in creation, disclosures perhaps never intended to be found at all, it isn’t a better understanding of “God” that we’re actually discovering?

As a believer in the literal interpretations of Holy Writ, I admit I am not so different than Sir Isaac Newton. I too am a proponent of pseudoscience. And yet there can only be one truth, where the shape of creation is concerned. All other roads, apparently, lead to Planet Earth.

Noel