President Trump UNLOADS On Senator Grassley

Uncategorized
Sarah

President Trump is fed up with Congress and especially Senator Chuck Grassley today.

He just (rightfully) unloaded on him for this “Blue Slip” nonsense that is holding up the entire Trump Agenda.

Watch here:

So….what exactly are these “Blue Slips” and where did they come from?

Glad you asked!

They date back to 1917 and they are not found anywhere in the Constitution.

Allow me to fill you in:

📜 Where blue slips came from — the history

Origins (around 1917)

  • The Senate began using blue slips as a formal way to enforce “senatorial courtesy,” an older idea that home-state senators should be consulted before nominees affecting their state are confirmed.

Mid-1900s

  • Over time, the blue slip evolved into a tool that could act as a near-veto.

  • From the 1950s through the 1970s, a single senator withholding a blue slip could completely block a nomination.

1980s–2000s

  • Different Judiciary Committee chairs treated blue slips differently.

  • Sometimes a missing slip stopped a nomination entirely.

  • Sometimes it only slowed things down.

  • Sometimes the committee ignored missing slips if the White House showed it had consulted the senators.

2010s–2020s

  • The blue slip lost power over appeals court nominations — chairs began holding hearings even without blue slips from home-state senators.

  • But for district judges and U.S. Attorneys, the blue slip still carries a lot of weight depending on the chair.

In short:
It started as courtesy → became a veto → became flexible → still matters heavily for certain positions today.

🎯 Why this matters even for short-term or temporary appointments

Even if a President wants to appoint someone to a position expected to last only a few months — such as an acting U.S. Attorney or an interim role — the full, permanent appointment still requires Senate confirmation.

If the nomination triggers the blue-slip process and the home-state senators don’t sign off, the nominee can be blocked from getting the permanent role, and the President may be forced to rely on temporary appointments.

🔎 How the blue-slip process is affecting Trump in December 2025

Here is the situation, stated factually:

  1. President Trump is making a number of nominations for U.S. Attorney and district court seats.
    These positions still traditionally rely on blue slips.

  2. Some home-state senators — especially Democrats, but also a few Republicans — are refusing to return blue slips on certain nominees.
    When a senator doesn’t return the slip, the Judiciary Committee can delay or decline to move forward.

  3. The current chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee (Chuck Grassley) still gives significant weight to the blue slip for district-level and U.S. Attorney nominations.
    That means a withheld blue slip can stall a nomination even if Trump wants it expedited.

  4. Several of Trump’s preferred nominees have been blocked or slowed because the home-state senators withheld blue slips.
    This includes a few high-profile picks for U.S. Attorney roles.

  5. Trump has publicly criticized the blue-slip practice as outdated and unfair because a single senator can obstruct his nominations, even for short-term or urgently needed positions.

  6. The impasse has created friction not only between Trump and Senate Democrats but also between Trump and some Senate Republicans who want to preserve the tradition of senatorial input.

In simple terms:
Even though Trump is President again, the blue-slip tradition lets individual senators slow down or stop certain nominees. This is especially true for positions tied closely to a specific state, like U.S. Attorneys. As of December 2025, that is one of the obstacles Trump is running into as he tries to fill some posts quickly, including those he intends only for short-term service.

RELATED REPORT:

President Trump Caught On Hot Mic — And He’s Not Wrong!

President Trump was just caught on a hot mic venting to someone named Ted or Jeff about how he can’t appoint anyone!

And he’s not wrong!

They’re trying to slow him down and run out the clock on him.

Here’s the best transcript I can make from the audio:

Hey ____.

I can’t appoint anybody. Everybody I’ve appointed here, time is expired. And then they’re in default and then we’re losing.

Watch here:

Another version here:

He’s exactly right!

Republicans in Congress are letting him down BIG LEAGUE!

IN the summer of 2019, I was seated in the wine cellar of a walled Medieval town high above the Dordogne Valley of France, not far from Sarlat-la-Canéda, making phone calls, writing reports. I have given this story in other places and it appears as though you’re about to hear it again. Rob Skiba is a name you that you might be familiar with. Though he had made a name for himself as a Nephilim researcher, more recently Rob had taken a dive into the deep end of the pool via flat earth research. The recorded interviews I conducted between he and Rick Hummer, a fellow flat earth investigator and close friend of his, was published while still occupying that very wine cellar. Read all about it. Chicago Is Not a Mirage.

Word quickly spread. Within a few short weeks, dozens of flat earth researchers began accepting my invite for a private interview, if not a series of interviews. From a 17th-century tower built by King Louis XIV, and with a stunning view of the Alps, I sat down with Robbie Davidson, founder of the Flat Earth International Conferences, conducting multiple sessions. While staying in Dumfries, Scotland, David Weiss agreed to take part in the interviews, as did Bob Knodel of Globebusters. There were others. But when I asked the interviewees to discuss the moments that shaped their lives, among the many PSYOPs, false flag attacks, and hoaxes that were discussed, only these men committed commentary to the false 9/11 narrative.

The resulting recordings ballooned into The Unexpected Cosmology, a book which became a website and was even intended as an anthology. And of course, the following discourse was originally a chapter. It was Walt Disney who stated, “Disneyland will never be completed. It will continue to grow as long as there is imagination left in the world.” Those sentiments remain applicable here as well. American Sensationalism: The 9/11 Interviews was always intended to be expanded upon with the inclusion of new researchers. So I’m sorry to say the project became stagnant during the Covid-19 psychodrama. I took a break to tackle other projects. We lost Rob Skiba. Rob offered hours of private conversation regarding his life but we never got around to the big one. 9/11. It was in the cards. Sadly, Bob Knodel died soon afterwards. Voices are being squeezed from an entire generation. Gnosis passes with them.

In the aftermath, the FE community became fractured. People began going their separate ways. Robbie Davidson, among a noted few others who were interviewed for the project, got up and left the movement altogether. It is not my intent to erase his or the contributions of others if only brief. They came, they went, their testimonies remain.

The original vision may have hit roadblocks but it is not forgotten. I expanded this paper a few years later to include testimony from author Pauly Hart, a dear friend of mine. I had wanted to continue that trend every year thereafter but you know how it goes. For the 25th anniversary of the attack I have redirected my efforts to its first large scale expansion, including Andrew Hoy and Darrin Geisinger into the mix. Perhaps others will lend their experiences to the recorder in time.

The following is their report.

Read the 9/11 Interviews

Watch the Interviews