Columbia University announces new Tel Aviv global center in Israel, further setting back BDS efforts across higher ed

Uncategorized

Columbia protest

The launch marks another setback for anti-Israel activists who had explicitly demanded that Columbia abandon the Tel Aviv center.

By Dion J. Pierre, The Algemeiner

It has been a rough 48 hours for proponents of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.

Columbia University confirmed Friday that it will begin programming at its Tel Aviv Global Center this summer, three years after first announcing the project, moving ahead with an academic hub intended to expand research, teaching, and partnerships with Israel despite pressure from anti-Zionist activists to cancel it.

“Columbia Global is pleased to roll out programming for the Tel Aviv Global Center,” the university told the Columbia Daily Spectator on Thursday, saying the facility would create opportunities through research, teaching, partnerships, and public events.

The center will become the 11th site in Columbia’s international network.

It is not a branch campus, but a hub designed to connect Columbia faculty, students, alumni, and programs with Israeli institutions and researchers.

Its initial priorities include climate change, technology and entrepreneurship, science, public health, and medicine.

Israeli journalist and Columbia School of International and Public Affairs adjunct professor Nadav Eyal first disclosed the imminent opening Monday on the “Call Me Back” podcast, which he recorded from the new Tel Aviv facility.

“As far as I know, there isn’t any other Ivy League that has this global center,” Eyal said, describing the launch as “history in the making.”

He added that the opening was especially meaningful after the turmoil surrounding Columbia’s handling of antisemitism and anti-Israel activism.

The launch marks another setback for anti-Israel activists who had explicitly demanded that Columbia abandon the Tel Aviv center.

Columbia University Apartheid Divest, the coalition behind the 2024 encampment movement, made cancellation of the project one of its principal demands, while Columbia College students voted that year to oppose its opening.

The development came just days after Student Workers of Columbia–United Auto Workers Local 2710 withdrew a bargaining proposal that would have required the university to divest from and stop contracting with entities deemed complicit in violations of international law.

Columbia described the proposal as an attempt to secure mandatory institutional support for the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement.

The union said withdrawing the proposal was a strategic concession necessary to advance negotiations over wages, benefits, and workplace protections.

The retreat does not necessarily end its broader anti-Israel campaign: Columbia previously said SWC-UAW had separately sought to prevent the Tel Aviv center from opening, and neither side announced that that demand had been withdrawn.

The developments follow nearly three years of upheaval at Columbia. After the Hamas-led massacre in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, the university became a center of the nationwide campus protest movement and experienced repeated antisemitism controversies.

Student organizer Khymani James was barred from campus after video emerged of James saying that “Zionists don’t deserve to live.”

Columbia also permanently removed three administrators from their Columbia College positions after text messages that university officials said touched on antisemitic tropes and dismissed Jewish students’ concerns.

In May 2025, masked protesters occupied Butler Library’s main reading room. Two public-safety officers were injured during a crowd surge, and dozens of demonstrators were arrested.

The incident followed the 2024 encampment and occupation of Hamilton Hall. President Minouche Shafik resigned in August 2024, citing the toll of intense turmoil.

Columbia subsequently reached agreements resolving federal investigations into alleged discrimination.

Under a July 2025 settlement, the university agreed to pay the federal government $200 million over three years and another $21 million to resolve Equal Employment Opportunity Commission claims.

Columbia did not admit legal wrongdoing, and the agreement restored access to billions of dollars in federal research funding.

The university has since strengthened disciplinary and security procedures, tightened identification requirements for masked demonstrators, incorporated the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism into the work of its Office of Institutional Equity, appointed coordinators to oversee Title VI and Title VII complaints, and expanded antisemitism education.

It also announced that it would neither recognize nor meet with the group calling itself Columbia University Apartheid Divest.

Columbia’s investment advisory committee has repeatedly rejected Israel-divestment proposals.

After rejecting a CUAD proposal in 2024 for lacking broad community consensus, the committee rejected three more in November 2025, citing substantial opposition among students, faculty, and alumni and finding some proposed categories “vague and excessively broad.”

Against that backdrop, the Tel Aviv center’s opening signals that Columbia intends to deepen—rather than sever—its academic relationship with Israel.

The post Columbia University announces new Tel Aviv global center in Israel, further setting back BDS efforts across higher ed appeared first on World Israel News.

IN the summer of 2019, I was seated in the wine cellar of a walled Medieval town high above the Dordogne Valley of France, not far from Sarlat-la-Canéda, making phone calls, writing reports. I have given this story in other places and it appears as though you’re about to hear it again. Rob Skiba is a name you that you might be familiar with. Though he had made a name for himself as a Nephilim researcher, more recently Rob had taken a dive into the deep end of the pool via flat earth research. The recorded interviews I conducted between he and Rick Hummer, a fellow flat earth investigator and close friend of his, was published while still occupying that very wine cellar. Read all about it. Chicago Is Not a Mirage.

Word quickly spread. Within a few short weeks, dozens of flat earth researchers began accepting my invite for a private interview, if not a series of interviews. From a 17th-century tower built by King Louis XIV, and with a stunning view of the Alps, I sat down with Robbie Davidson, founder of the Flat Earth International Conferences, conducting multiple sessions. While staying in Dumfries, Scotland, David Weiss agreed to take part in the interviews, as did Bob Knodel of Globebusters. There were others. But when I asked the interviewees to discuss the moments that shaped their lives, among the many PSYOPs, false flag attacks, and hoaxes that were discussed, only these men committed commentary to the false 9/11 narrative.

The resulting recordings ballooned into The Unexpected Cosmology, a book which became a website and was even intended as an anthology. And of course, the following discourse was originally a chapter. It was Walt Disney who stated, “Disneyland will never be completed. It will continue to grow as long as there is imagination left in the world.” Those sentiments remain applicable here as well. American Sensationalism: The 9/11 Interviews was always intended to be expanded upon with the inclusion of new researchers. So I’m sorry to say the project became stagnant during the Covid-19 psychodrama. I took a break to tackle other projects. We lost Rob Skiba. Rob offered hours of private conversation regarding his life but we never got around to the big one. 9/11. It was in the cards. Sadly, Bob Knodel died soon afterwards. Voices are being squeezed from an entire generation. Gnosis passes with them.

In the aftermath, the FE community became fractured. People began going their separate ways. Robbie Davidson, among a noted few others who were interviewed for the project, got up and left the movement altogether. It is not my intent to erase his or the contributions of others if only brief. They came, they went, their testimonies remain.

The original vision may have hit roadblocks but it is not forgotten. I expanded this paper a few years later to include testimony from author Pauly Hart, a dear friend of mine. I had wanted to continue that trend every year thereafter but you know how it goes. For the 25th anniversary of the attack I have redirected my efforts to its first large scale expansion, including Andrew Hoy and Darrin Geisinger into the mix. Perhaps others will lend their experiences to the recorder in time.

The following is their report.

Watch the Interviews