Dark Speeches—an Ongoing Spiritual Leprosy (and Introduction to Plato)

The Mortal Soul

iStock-981600810.jpg

MOSES HAD MARRIED A BLACK WOMAN. More specifically, she was a Cushite—of Ethiopian descent. For this assault on their intellect, and his father-in-law’s constant mingling in Hebrew affairs, Aaron and Miriam succumbed to their pride and took umbrage. “Hath the LORD indeed spoken only by Moses?” They groaned with protest. “Hath He not spoken also by us?”

Moses simply records of their discord: “And the LORD heard it (Numbers 12:2).”

God did not delay correction either. He came suddenly unto Moses and his quarrelsome siblings, demanding a private conference among them so as not to spread their gangrenous division throughout the ranks of Israel. The pillar of cloud that led them by day and which burned as a pillar of fire by night promptly descended and stood in the door of the tabernacle. But for this particular meeting God had no apparent business or qualms with the lawgiver. It was with Aaron and Miriam, we read, on whom His anger was kindled. Surely, their legs wobbled with the sinewy strength of a wet noddle when He pronounced their names, and feebly resisted the buckling of knees when obediently complying to His demand that they “step forward.”

Prophets will receive visions and dream dreams, the LORD explained, but concerning His servant Moses, “with him will I speak mouth to mouth, even apparently, and not in dark speeches (Numbers 12:8).”

When Aaron gazed upon Miriam, his sister was “white as snow.” She had, rather abruptly, become a leper. But is it true what they say here in the west—is leprosy a thing of the past among God’s children today?

Some people want to be the bride at every wedding, others the corpse at every funeral, and ever since the ink was dried on the final pages of Revelation our pulpits and pews have been in no short supply of those who personify the protests of Moses’ envious siblings. Hath the LORD indeed spoken only by Moses? Hath He not spoken also by us?

iStock-813910894.jpg

The church I love—and which I obstinately refuse to give up on—is quite frankly a malodor of Greek philosophy and preconceived notions. I say this at the open risk of being held in contempt by the brethren and even more fearfully, in dire hope that the LORD does not call my name, demanding that I “step forward.” But the facts remain. Whether it is Plato’s globe and the Copernican Revolution which defiantly clothes its intended esoteric purposes with the ordinances of Science; or the Mystery religions modern charismatic uprising by way of a counterfeit Holy Ghost; any one of our cultural or patriotic “high places” which we dare not aggravate; an impending damnation in mythological underworlds flavored with eternal torment and unending destruction; or the Gnostics we once feverishly hoped to liquidate but have, rather ironically, completely blindsided us with gluttonous hopes of immortality, bodiless souls freed from fleshly shackles, and a heavenly ascension to boot; it seems like everyone wants to be the mouthpiece for God.

For the God-fearing soul, everywhere he turns—be it the congregation he loves or the social media saturation which seeks to inform his beliefs on a minute-by-minute basis—he has little choice but to entangle his soul with the spiritual leprous rather than the bacterial of old while they seek to enlighten him with horse blinders and The Gospel According to Plato. Even now, three millennia’s beyond Mount Sanai, and nearly two-thousand years since the last of the Apostles have died, God’s mouth-piece is apparently everywhere.

In short, we have settled for dark speeches.

 

Noel

IN the summer of 2019, I was seated in the wine cellar of a walled Medieval town high above the Dordogne Valley of France, not far from Sarlat-la-Canéda, making phone calls, writing reports. I have given this story in other places and it appears as though you’re about to hear it again. Rob Skiba is a name you that you might be familiar with. Though he had made a name for himself as a Nephilim researcher, more recently Rob had taken a dive into the deep end of the pool via flat earth research. The recorded interviews I conducted between he and Rick Hummer, a fellow flat earth investigator and close friend of his, was published while still occupying that very wine cellar. Read all about it. Chicago Is Not a Mirage.

Word quickly spread. Within a few short weeks, dozens of flat earth researchers began accepting my invite for a private interview, if not a series of interviews. From a 17th-century tower built by King Louis XIV, and with a stunning view of the Alps, I sat down with Robbie Davidson, founder of the Flat Earth International Conferences, conducting multiple sessions. While staying in Dumfries, Scotland, David Weiss agreed to take part in the interviews, as did Bob Knodel of Globebusters. There were others. But when I asked the interviewees to discuss the moments that shaped their lives, among the many PSYOPs, false flag attacks, and hoaxes that were discussed, only these men committed commentary to the false 9/11 narrative.

The resulting recordings ballooned into The Unexpected Cosmology, a book which became a website and was even intended as an anthology. And of course, the following discourse was originally a chapter. It was Walt Disney who stated, “Disneyland will never be completed. It will continue to grow as long as there is imagination left in the world.” Those sentiments remain applicable here as well. American Sensationalism: The 9/11 Interviews was always intended to be expanded upon with the inclusion of new researchers. So I’m sorry to say the project became stagnant during the Covid-19 psychodrama. I took a break to tackle other projects. We lost Rob Skiba. Rob offered hours of private conversation regarding his life but we never got around to the big one. 9/11. It was in the cards. Sadly, Bob Knodel died soon afterwards. Voices are being squeezed from an entire generation. Gnosis passes with them.

In the aftermath, the FE community became fractured. People began going their separate ways. Robbie Davidson, among a noted few others who were interviewed for the project, got up and left the movement altogether. It is not my intent to erase his or the contributions of others if only brief. They came, they went, their testimonies remain.

The original vision may have hit roadblocks but it is not forgotten. I expanded this paper a few years later to include testimony from author Pauly Hart, a dear friend of mine. I had wanted to continue that trend every year thereafter but you know how it goes. For the 25th anniversary of the attack I have redirected my efforts to its first large scale expansion, including Andrew Hoy and Darrin Geisinger into the mix. Perhaps others will lend their experiences to the recorder in time.

The following is their report.

Watch the Interviews